If You're Trying To Get Documents From A Kansas Resident, Subpoena First, Ask Questions Later
Kansas, like many other jurisdictions, does not recognize the tort of spoliation absent another independent tort, contract, agreement, voluntary assumption of a duty, or special relationship. Kansas has also held that neither a commercial relationship nor knowledge of pending litigation is the type of special relationship that creates a duty to preserve documents.
In Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. Kimball, counsel for Superior sent a letter to counsel for one of its previous suppliers, Ferris Kimball Company, informing the company that Superior intended to subpoena FK’s sales records covering 15 years of sales to Superior relevant to pending litigation in which Superior was a defendant. FK immediately destroyed 3 pallets of boxes containing 70 years of sales records, including the records Superior intended to subpoena.
Superior brought suit against FK and its principal, Kimball, who personally destroyed some of the records. Superior suggested it and FK had a special relationship based on FK’s knowledge of the pending litigation and FK’s longstanding commercial relationship with Superior. The Kansas Supreme Court held that simply being in the chain of distribution of a product or in the stream of commerce is not a special relationship that gives rise to a duty to preserve evidence. The Supreme Court also refused to recognize a new tort of spoliation in the case where the entity destroying evidence may become a party to ongoing litigation as a codefendant or third party defendant to an indemnity claim. The question of whether a potential adverse party destroys evidence is subject to a spoliation claim remains unanswered.
The full opinion in Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. Kimball, may be found here.
About Kansas Law Blog
Baker Sterchi's Kansas Law Blog examines significant developments, trends and changes in Kansas law on a broad range of topics that are of interest to Kansas practitioners and to businesses evaluating risks under Kansas law or managing litigation subject to Kansas law.
Subscribe via email
Subscribe to rss feeds
RSS FeedsABOUT baker sterchi blogs
Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC (Baker Sterchi) publishes this website as a service to our clients, colleagues and others, for informational purposes only. These materials are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, and are not a substitute for sound legal advice. You should not base any action or lack of action on any information included in our website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. If you contact us through our website or via email, no attorney-client relationship is created, and no confidential information should be transmitted. Communication with Baker Sterchi by e-mail or other transmissions over the Internet may not be secure, and you should not send confidential electronic messages that are not adequately encrypted.
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision, which should not be based solely on information appearing on our website. To the extent our website has provided links to other Internet resources, those links are not under our control, and we are not responsible for their content. We do our best to provide you current, accurate information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information is the most current, correct or complete. In addition, you should not take this information as a promise or indication of future results.
Disclaimer
The Kansas Law Blog is made available by Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLC for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your use of this blog site alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and the firm.
Confidential information
Do not include confidential information in comments or other feedback or messages related to the Kansas Law Blog, as these are neither confidential nor secure methods of communicating with attorneys. The Kansas Law Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.